Class Action: Vann v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, et. al.

Home Forum Litigation Class Action: Vann v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, et. al.

Tagged: 

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Admin 2 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12673 Reply

    Admin
    Keymaster

    Vann v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, et. al. USDC, Southern District of California, Case No. 3:13-CV-02221-BEN-WVG, removed September 16, 2013 from Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2013-00062206-CU-OE-CTL (filed August 12, 2013).
    A former massage therapist of multiple franchised clinics alleges various violations of the California wage and hour laws. The plaintiff seeks to represent a class of all massage therapist and estheticians who worked at any Massage Envy franchisee in California since August 12, 2009.

    Update 1/6/15:
    Judge Roger T. Benitez granted motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant Massage Envy Franchising LLC finding that “MEF was not an employer or joint employer of Mr. Vann, and therefore, cannot be liabile for any wage violations committed by (Franchise Owner).
    This case is effectively closed unless appealed. Copy of motion attached.

    • This topic was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by  Admin.
    Attachments:
    1. Vann-MSJ.pdf
    #15447 Reply

    Flamedweller

    (Awaiting moderation)

    #16990 Reply

    LouisGot

    (Awaiting moderation)

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Reply To: Class Action: Vann v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, et. al.
Your information:




Comments are closed.